This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Strange peaks in normalized FPKM data

Hi!

This is my first time asking a question on this forum. My apologies for any (obvious) mistakes.

Background: Gene expression data in FPKM format 48 hours after stim. Eight samples (4 HD and 4 sick). Columns are samples, rows are genes.

FPKM data was log2 transformed, all values <1 were filtered out and genes with too many NA's too (at least 3 values) .

After this the values are normalized using Z-score normalization, I use the following steps:

SDs <- apply(x,1,function(x){sd(x,na.rm = T)})
means <- rowMeans(x, na.rm = T)
RNA_log2_FPKM_cleaned <- (x - means) / SDs

Peaking at the data via a histogram results in the following:

T48 histogram after preprocessing, what are those weird peaks?

These peaks are at places -0.707 and 0.707. They were not all the same value before the Zs-score normalization (as they were different genes). Have I done something wrong? Thanks in advance for any help I can get.

gene-expression fpkm
• 1,210 views • link
written by Cathy • Cathy

1 answer

How can a gene have NA counts in RNA-seq? I can be 0, but not NA. The 0.707 is suspicious because that's the value you get when scaling just two numbers that are different, e.g. scale(c(1, -1)). I guess you have rows with just two values not being NA. Again, where do the NAs come from?

By the way, the easier way of scaling a matrix is t(scale(t(x))).

• 0 views • link
written by ATpoint ATpoint

I suspect the same " guess you have rows with just two values not being NA"

• 0 views • link
written by Zhenyu Zhang Zhenyu Zhang

Thank you for your help and info!

The NA's are a result of filtering all values below 1 (all <1 <- NA). I thought the next step would remove all NA's with less than 3 values, but I will edit it to actually do that.

I will also scale the matrix in the easier method. Thanks again!

• 0 views • link
written by Cathy • Cathy

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this