ConsensusClusterPlus on DEGs
Hello everyone,
I am writing to inquire about the suitability of using the ConsensusClusterPlus clustering method for my 1000 DEG genes (differentially expressed genes) between T (tumor) and normal samples. Additionally, I am considering alternative methods such as K-means for clustering these genes.
I am aware that the WGCNA package suggests avoiding gene filtering before running the method. Therefore, I am seeking guidance on whether it is advisable to proceed with ConsensusClusterPlus or explore other approaches like K-means for this purpose.
Thank you for your attention.
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Which Should Take Priority When Selecting DEGs: FDR or Log Fold Change?
written by bioinfo1994 •
-
Need Help with Normalizing Western Blot Data with Inter-Gel Variability
written by Anto •
-
Seeking Guidance on Standardization Methods for eQTL Analyses with Diverse Preprocessing Techniques
written by DS •
-
How/why contigs and scaffolds end up being identical in number and length by spades de novo assembl…
written by dejenieshif •
-
Tutorial: Unsupervised clustering on gene expression data
written by Hamid Ghaedi
-
Extract differentially expressed genes list from DESeq2 results for each of the sample provided
written by Lawrence •
-
Why k value for k-means clustering is low for large dataset?
written by anikng •
-
Error in (function...) thrown by WGCNA tutorial (R)
written by Kristin Muench
-
Sample clustering from TCGA dataset
written by bharata1803
-
Automatic clustering for gene expressing matrix
written by J.F.Jiang
