Question about umap using different numbers of pca components as initialization
I am new to the scRNA-seq field and I have been doing some experiments of visualization of UMAP using different numbers of PCA components for initialization. The process involves projecting scRNA-seq data (count matrix) onto various numbers of PCA components, followed by non-linear dimension reduction using UMAP. It seems that the UMAP results are exactly the same across different initializations, regardless of the number of PCA components used. Are there any theoretical reasons for this? I am using Dynamo and their function dyn.tl.reduceDimension(adata, n_pca_components=30) for the experiments.
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Intermixed clusters and cell types in UMAP for scRNA-seq analysis
written by bio_info •
-
Using get_normalized_expression (scVI) vs. Log-Normalized Counts
written by Nicolas •
-
scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq integration issue
written by inayat45shaikh •
-
Transforming RNAseq data with widely varying library sizes
written by adampennycuick
-
Force directed graphs compared to other dimensionality reduction methods for scRNA-seq
written by MutationalMeltdown
-
scRNA-seq reduction plot for individual group
written by Morris_Chair
-
UMAP vs "rigorous" t-SNE
written by rtrende •
-
PCA vs ICA prior to t-SNE or UMAP
written by rtrende •
-
Slingshot: how do you choose which type of dimensionality reduction to use it with?
written by Friederike
-
Tutorial: Principal Component Analysis (PCA ON T-BIOINFO)
written by elia.brodsky
