Buffo , in some ways i think that i must be missing something - the process of calculating conservation scores does not, so far as i am aware, change dependent upon functional annotations (such as, for instance, "is exonic"), unless you are specifically attempting just such an analysis but I did not get the sense taht you are.
As such, I'd guess that the procedure does not vary from normal protocols for the same, i.e.
1) generate multiple sequence alignment
2) construct phylogenetic tree
3) select tool, e.g. PhyloP conservation score (PHAST)
4) select method (stick with PHAST/phyloP for a moment, could choose LRT or, for instance, something like CONACC
while some tools, e.g. vert30 or some such, are very specifically targeting certain clades, in general most tutorials on this subject will cover these basics and more. does this help at all? if you need more info, sorry/please do let me know.
Best,
VAL
just for context, you are looking for a particular splice isoform being conserved, correct? not necessarily that the actual sequence inside the intron is conserved (that is a somewhat different issue)
irrespective the same procedures would apply, right colin? what do you think?
thanks, I edited my question