WGS sample has lower mapping rate (92%), bimodal depth of coverage peak and aberrant synonymous/missense variation rate
Hi,
I am trying to determine if there is an artifact from sequencing or if there is something real happening with a sample that I sequenced alongside two other samples. Some basics
Mapping Rate --> S1 99.7%, S2 92.13%, S3 99.71%
SNPs --> S1 22K, S2 73K, S3 23K
Sequence depth - target 100X, average all around 100, but S2 has another peak about 10% the size of main peak at 100 at around 50 reads, the other two have almost no loci < 80 reads.
Best, Andrew
• 1,007 views
•
link
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
Which species? How did you compute sequence depth? Via kmer counts? Could it be that S2 is simply highly heterozyogus compared to S1 and S3?