comparing between two alignments
Dears,
When comparing between two alignments A, B for the same data set but different algorithm (e.g alignment A from ClustalW and alignment B from MUSCLE), suppose alignment A has less number of SNPs. Does less number of SNPs make alignment A better than alignment B? If yes please mention some papers talking about that.
Thank you in advance.
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Is comparing seeds sufficient, or should alignments be compared instead?
written by curiousfellow@123 •
-
What exactly is Biopython's alignment.score variable?
written by Tom •
-
Comparing alignments of differing length - what's the right test?
written by ngarber •
-
Clustal Omega on uniprot
written by kodo64 •
-
How the ClustalW do the sequence-profile alignment and profile-profile alignment?
written by hmedinasantacruz •
-
plz , how can i get a standard dataset from balibase?
written by sallyzaki70 •
-
Gene set enrrichment, GO; Comparing Effect Size between two groups
written by rb14sp •
-
Tool: ADOMA: A Command Line Tool to Modify ClustalW Multiple Alignment Output
written by Benn
-
How to know the accuracy of a Multiple Sequence Alignment?
written by mithrandir •
-
How To Use Plink To Compute The Ld Between Two Sets Of Snps?
written by Fayue1015 •
There should be research articles about clustalW and MUSCLE available in the same area where you found and downloaded the programs. If you are looking at alignments it will depend on the scoring function. I would say less amount of gaps makes alignment A better than alignment B.