Multi-mapping vs uniquely mapping reads for Ribo-Seq
I’m trying to figure out if it's better to use multi-mapping reads or only uniquely mapping reads for RiboSeq data analysis. Since the reads are short, the % of uniquely mapping reads is likely to be quite small. I'm aligning to the transcriptome, so that helps some with the multi-mapping problem.
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
(STAR) What causes a high number of reads that are unmapped because they are too short?
written by becky.reese •
-
Multi-mapped reads in Ribo-Seq data, discard or keep?
written by Carmen •
-
Using multimaping reads or unique reads on featurecounts?
written by omargmc.tak •
-
STAR aligner can't map too short reads
written by Assa Yeroslaviz
-
Human transcriptome STAR multi-mapped problem
written by Валентин •
-
Too many unmapped reads - STAR alignment
written by codsorre •
-
Is it possible to use local blastn to obtain the aligned sequences of complete record files?
written by Alec Watanabe
-
STAR output - high multi-mapping, low alignment (human)
written by anikb •
-
Viral integration with RNA-seq data
written by KVC_bioinfo
-
Uniquely mapped reads and differential expression analysis with Trinity
written by seta
