Thank you for the reply.
I have found that according to wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FASTQ_format), all fastq files produced by fastq-dump from sra toolkit have all unified sanger quality encoding.
Best regards Paweł
Hello,
I have imported sample SRA to my local machine, then I have converted the SRA to fastq using sra-toolkit from ncbi. As a next step, I would like to perform quality trimming using sicke: https://github.com/najoshi/sickle The problem is that i don't know which quality type format to use (solexa, illumina or sanger). If I understand correctly, fastq files should have some kind of normalized format, (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/docs/sra-data-formats/ ), however I dont know which one is it.
Does this normalized format means that all fastq files from different bioprojects has the same quality scores? If not, how do I determine the correct format?
Thank you in advance, Pawel
Most SRA data of recent vintage should be in standard Illumina format. If you are using an old dataset (> 6-7 yr old) then it could be in other formats. You can test data formats using testformat.sh from BBMap suite.
Thank you for the reply.
I have found that according to wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FASTQ_format), all fastq files produced by fastq-dump from sra toolkit have all unified sanger quality encoding.
Best regards Paweł
Log in to answer this question.