This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Uneven base quality in NGS read?

I am analyzing the NGS data from my colleage. AFAK, it is a 16s amplicon data from illumina's novaseq 6000.

The quality's report from fastp has a really weird quality distribution. While overall (mean) quality is good, the quality of each base is uneven with a huge spurious huge drop all over sequence (see pic below). Is this normal?

Forward read, before QC

Forward read, after QC

Thank you.

illumina 16s fastp ngs

what's the region size sequenced? v1 and v6 are small regions.

They are 250/250 pair-reads. Reverse reads 's quality look similar to forward but worse.

0 answers

No answers yet.

Log in to answer this question.