Hello,
I have RNA time-course data and am looking to benchmark two different DESeq2 models I want to use. One design models time as a categorical variable, while the other design models time as a continuous variable. I am wondering if anyone knows of any R packages or methods to compute values such as AUROC to compare these two models performance in detecting DEGs.
Thank you
•
written
by
jdhindsa1999 •
1 answer
To generate AUROC statistics requires both a set of defined true positives and true negatives to serve as the "ground truth" to compare model performance against. This is typically achieved via cross validations when developing models.
For an example from a related post see https://www.biostars.org/p/271616/#271616
Log in to answer this question.
-
News: Online course. -Time series analysis and Forecasting in R
written by Physalia-courses
-
DESeq2 for time series and control-treated groups
written by t.ru •
-
Determining up-regulation vs down-regulation DESeq2 likelihood ratio test
written by jdhindsa1999 •
-
Interpreting likelihood ratio tests using DESeq2
written by jdhindsa1999 •
-
Tools for screening the influence/importance of covariates in multidimensional data
written by Papyrus
-
DESeq multiple factor question
written by jdhindsa1999 •
-
fGSEA with preranked data based off gene expression using DeSeq2
written by jack.henry •
-
Deal with the time-course RNA-Seq datasets
written by wangdp123
-
What does benchmark method exactly mean?
written by statfa
-
Limma Continuous variable vs categorical variable
written by spurthy111 •
Do you have a set of validated DEGs (from another source of data) that can serve as the ground truth for your DESeq2 models? Is this in-silico RNA-seq data or real experimental data?