Why ABSOLUTE calculate CCF=NA?
I am recently running ABSOLUTE for CCF, but I surprisedly found some of my mutations have an >1 old_cancer_frac, but "NA for cancer_cell_frac instead. Also, these mutations were not identified as neither "clonal" nor "subclonal". Why will this happen? I have checked the purity of these mutations but it seems normal.
Please give me some advice
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Issue Running SomaticCombiner
written by Emily •
-
Set.seed in Seurat
written by Laven9 •
-
Discrepancy between VEP and IGV
written by ijk8qd •
-
Plink associations using covariates as numeric or dummy
written by jamespower •
-
How to interpret ABSOLUTE plots
written by stardustcx •
-
SomaticSniper: Depth of reads supporting variant(s) in normal =0
written by thestaroceanster •
-
WES samples failing ABSOLUTE
written by mkaushal
-
Calling differential peaks on ATAC-seq data
written by ldyer2006 •
-
Correcting for tumor purity in tumor evolution analysis
written by cbst
-
how to compare somatic mutation counts across samples sequenced to differing depths
written by timodonnell
