BlastP Output:
Query Hit e-value id bit_score score qry_start qry_end hit_start hit_end align_len hit_len
protein hit1 2.00E-06 49 55.1 131 11 73 2 63 63 169
protein hit2 4.00E-05 22 50.8 120 12 188 9 239 234 361
protein hit3 5.00E-05 37 50.4 119 9 82 7 81 75 493
protein hit4 5.00E-05 37 50.4 119 9 82 7 81 75 493
protein hit5 5.00E-05 37 50.4 119 9 82 7 81 75 493
By all other parameters except alignment length, hit1 is he best sequence hit of BlastP for my query protein.
But here, these hits are used for annotating kegg pathways.
I have only one doubt:
If alignment length affects the selection of best hit then hit2 (alignment length= 234) might be a good hit. Is it so?
What parameters should be taken as selection criterion for best hit?
Thanks in advance.
1 answer
Lot of subjectivism issues involved- though standard parameters could be adapted from Published literature.
However-
Bit Score, E-values, alignment lengths are usually "length/ match non-specific"! Imagine the following situations (1), very high E-value for 22 nts, or (2)for a 1000 bp ORF: an alignment length of 200 bp? Or a (3) high bit score over just 500 bp ?
Thus, most people will use a double-edged sword: "E-value < 1-E05 AND 80 % Coverage of length" (some may prefer 50 % as cut-off as well!) (=YOUR selection criterion for best hit) : And this stringency will affect your "gene call/ KEGG annotation" or all those numbers for sure !
Thanks,
Log in to answer this question.