Pruning With Plink Variance Inflation Factor (--Indep) Vs. Pairwise Genotipic Correlation (--Indep-Pairwise).
Hi everybody,
I need to make some pruning with different R squared (0.5, 0.2, 0.01). Data is in plink format. That was ok I used the flag --indep-pairwise 50 5 0.01, but using --indep 50 5 0.01 I got twice as much SNPs in output. Why so big difference?
• 5,916 views
•
link
updated
by
Ram
•
written
by
makaonte •
•
written
by
makaonte •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Pruning with plink finds a majority of SNPs in very high LD
written by enferdeflame •
-
Correct command line syntax for plink2
written by dec986
-
individual-level allele frequencies
written by anamaria
-
choice of snps for pca analysis
written by wrab425 •
-
Using vcftools to filter SNPs by a linkage disequilibrium (r2) threshold
written by shyamie •
-
Pruning a dense SNP dataset without losing too much LD
written by yorgos.athanasiadis •
-
i want to know if plink is running prunning
written by rihou66 •
-
Good value of r2 in pruned data
written by nagaramajdi •
-
Forum: Plink problem Linkage disequilibrium based SNP pruning
written by benhalimayossra •
-
r2 correlation interpretation snp in plink pruning
written by Floris Brenk
