Microarray Time Series With No Replicates
3
1
Entering edit mode
11.5 years ago
datanerd ▴ 520

Hi all, I have a 17 point time series data with no replicates. I wanted to find significant gene profiles over this 17 time points. Is masigpro R package good for my data? This is just one sample treated after injury (i.e there is no treated vs control) Apart from Matlab, what other R packages would you suggest for such data? Thanks in advance.

r • 4.8k views
ADD COMMENT
4
Entering edit mode
11.5 years ago

With gene expression data, you have essentially two large classes of analysis and you will likely want to apply both:

  1. supervised
  2. unsupervised

For supervised analysis, you might be able to make "pseudo-replicates" by treating your 17 time points as early, middle, and late, for example. Then, use any number of statistical packages to compute differentially-expressed genes between the groups. For unsupervised analyses, you have a lot of options including hierarchical clustering, k-means clustering, PCA, NMF, and many more. The trick to these is to limit to a set of genes that is regulated in your system. Often, using the top X% of the most variable genes (where X is chosen to keep the number of genes manageable) will suffice. Cluster only the genes and order the samples by time to see trends in the data.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks for the answer Sean. I was wondering with the "pseudo replicates", since my data is over four days, can I treat each day time points as replicates? And is this the same as what is said about the dummy variable setting in masigpro package for long time series?

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I cannot tell you what make biological sense in your system, but you could try each day as a separate factor level, yes. I do not know much about the masigpro package, so I cannot really comment on it directly.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

the data is the treated cells with a drug after every24 hours. But i found many genes to respond differently on the first day than the others. So even I am not sure if that makes biological sense to treat them as replicates. Would appreciate your insight on this. Thanks for the suggestions though :)

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Unfortunately, your experimental design is less than optimal. For supervised analyses, replication is REQUIRED. However, you can still do unsupervised analysis.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thanks. Will try unsupervised analysis.

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
9.0 years ago

While I agree that it is always best to have replicates, I think timecourse will provide an option to analyze your data:

http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/timecourse.html

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
11.5 years ago
JC 13k

I suggest you Limma. Because you have no controls per each time point, maybe you can use T0 as the control for all points.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Limma will still not be very useful without replicates.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I agree, it's always hard to do good analysis without replicates.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1970 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6