In mas5 there is the stratification into a (absent), m (marginally), p(present).
I think the mas5 normalization is not very good (underestimates the low range (or was it overestimates ?, I forgot)).
The a,m,p classification however is rather accurate.
You could normalize with GCRMA, then plot the density of expression. You normally see a huge peak that
represents the not expressed genes, then expressed genes come up. 2 distributions: low end = background intensities
of not expressed genes which fluctuates higher = intensities from expressed genes.
Choose a cutoff somewhere where you think most of the data comes from
the expressed genes. In the data shown I would say that between intensities 4-5 probes (not genes!!) might be detected as expressed
(~ marginally in mas5) and above 5 they are reliably expressed and detected.
