transcript differential expression analysis
Hi,
So I developed an algorithm to quantify some transcripts. I want to do differential expression analysis on these transcripts (control vs treatment). Initially, I calculated log2FC and did Wilcoxon ranked test on it, and found a significantly differentially expressed transcript. Then, I did Wilcoxon directly on control vs treatment, but for the same transcript, I found no difference. So I am wondering, when we do DE analysis, what's the null hypothesis? Is it log2FC = 0 or ctrl = tret? The two null hypotheses look literally the same, but why we get different results eventually?
• 998 views
•
link
written
by
robinycfang •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
How to remove batch effect in RNA-seq using control samples?
written by AS20 •
-
Assessing how similar/ different of activated pathways between multiple groups of samples
written by cwwong13 •
-
Assessing controls for RNASeq
written by lockdowndog •
-
DEseq2 design matrix with 3 factors
written by kand3e •
-
Denovo RNA seq
written by kanwarjag
-
Cellular development RNAseq
written by rob.costa1234
-
Analysis of ratios (fold changes) from different microarray experiments with common control
written by matt.arno •
-
differential expression at transcript level with paired samples
written by mjg •
-
Can we crosscheck log2 fold change in gene expression data?
written by madkitty
-
[DESeq2 multiple treatments vs. 1-by-1] Inconsistant p-adj
written by madkitty
You need to provide more information on your experiment. Right now it's unclear what your methodology is, and what question you are trying to address.