Hello,
My laboratory developed an in-house 5'RACE method with custom primers targeting the constant region of the gamma/delta T cells. We submitted RNA to a third party commercial laboratory to benchmark our method against their 5'RACE method. Both our in-house fastq's and the third party's were processed using MiXCR. How legitimate is it to compare clones from the different library prep methods in a longitudinal analysis (more time points were captured in the in-house method than were submitted to the third party)? Thanks!
•
written
by
tdfyoder •
1 answer
Hi, different methods can lead to different results thus I would recommend work with these datasets separately. But you should see some major differences and likelihoods if the are there even if you join the datasets. Also, how different are the two methods? is the difference only in C gene primers? does any of the two use UMIs?
Log in to answer this question.
-
Herald: The Biostar Herald for Monday, April 24, 2023
written by Biostar
-
Sc-RNA seq 5’ V2 PE auto detected by CellRanger as R2 only chemistry
written by ashley.fletcher2 •
-
Job: Multiple Opportunities in Microbial Computational Biology at Lanzatech
written by wpmitchell •
-
scRNA-Seq GEX 5' v1.0 High Cell Count with Low Gene Count
written by tdfyoder •
-
Job: PostDoc position at Human Genome Sequencing Center @ Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, …
written by Medhat
-
Adding RNA-Seq reads from one sequencing experiment to reads from another experiment
written by newbio17
-
Job: Analytical Performance Scientist, Danone North America, Louisville, CO, USA
written by laurenkleine18 •
-
Job: Unique Opportunity: Systems Analyst, Clinical Genomics, The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Med…
written by JAX-GM •
-
Job: Postdoctoral Associate - CANCER EVOLUTION, JAX-GM, Farmington, CT, USA
written by JAX-GM •
-
Job: Bioinformatics Scientist - Becton Dickinson
written by nicole_vacca •
