How to interpret "pseudo count" in gene expression data handling context?
I am reading a paper that has a passage describing the pre-processing of gene expression data before conducting the experiments. The passage states "After conversion to a base-2 logarithm with a pseudo count of 0.125, batch normalization using ComBat was applied".
What exactly is a pseudo count? What I understood initially was that you add 0.125 to every value in your gene expression matrix and then take the logarithm of that to avoid taking the logarithm of 0 (which is not defined). This is based on my intuition though and I would like to know if this is correct and if there are other reasons why pseudo counts are used.
1 answer
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Can I use raw read counts from the GTEx data for cross-tissue comparison?
written by mukherjeeliana24 •
-
Exploring Diet Effects in Single-Cell RNA Sequencing
written by Darya •
-
How to count mutations to check for transcription strand bias?
written by n,n
-
Identifying common genes which show different transcript and protein expression
written by Vinesh •
-
What could explain the difference in RNA-seq and Microarray expression levels?
written by N •
-
PCA Analysis to cluster experiments using H3K27ac signal mouse enhancers, taking log of signals + s…
written by Simaranrajorass22 •
-
What exactly should and shouldn't go in Combat's model matrix?
written by n,n
-
Can I use batch effect correction "by parts"?
written by n,n
-
Should normalization of expression data be performed over the entire dataset or only over the used …
written by n,n
-
Is it okay to scale the RNA-Seq counts after log-transformation?
written by ebrudermanver
