Using the Enhanced Volcano plot results in an empty plot with no data points displayed

i am using the Enhancedvolcano package to draw a volcano plot.

An extract from the dataframe res1 is

 head(res1)
      HGNC_Symbol Log2_FoldChange   pvalue
    1       PEPD        0.8480846 2.326743
    2       MBD3        0.6007764 2.502897
    3   IVNS1ABP        0.8026820 3.581674
    4      VPS36        0.7569063 2.129111
    5      NUP88        0.7448036 2.513232
    6       MCM6        0.5858087 1.498180

and the code i am using is

library(EnhancedVolcano)

  EnhancedVolcano(res1,
    lab = 'res1$HGNC_Symbol',
    x = 'Log2_FoldChange',
    y = 'pvalue',
      xlim = c(-5, 8))

This give rise to the following error and i get an empty volcano plot with no points

Warning message:
Removed 592 rows containing missing values (geom_point).

can anyone pls suggest what i am doing wrong?

Thanks

r enhanced volcano package

• 4,904 views • link

written 6.3 years ago by peter.berry5 •

Assume this is a typo, but your EnhancedVolcano call uses res 1 rather than res1.

• 0 views • link

written 6.3 years ago by jared.andrews07

Peter, can you confirm that this was the issue? Otherwise, there's no reason for an empty plot to be produced, unless you have some other devices open elsewhere that are interfering, and/or your res1 object's columns are not encoded correctly.

• 0 views • link

written 6.3 years ago by Kevin Blighe

Kevin, I corrected the error that jared spotted but am still getting the same error message. I noticed in other posts some comments about version numbers. I am running r 3.5.2 is that the issue? The only other thing I can think of is the my spread on the y axis is very small. The largest number is only 2.20. The experiment didn't produce DE genes with huge fold changes.

• 0 views • link

written 6.3 years ago by peter.berry5 •

Could it be related to the p-values all being > 1? As this would give negative values when -log10?

peter.berry5, are you sure you did not mix up p-value and FC column?

• 0 views • link

written 6.3 years ago by ATpoint

Indeed, your p-values are outside the range expected for p-values. For example:

-log10(2.326743)
[1] -0.3667484

So, they will not even appear in the plot space.

• 0 views • link

written 6.3 years ago by Kevin Blighe

Kevin and AT point, Thanks for all the help. I caclulated my log 2 and -log 10 values previously (the column names aren't v clear but the data I provided is the results of those calculations) and it is these values I passed to the Enhanced Volcanos plot as my "x" and "y". Is there a way I can modify the package or graphing code to plot the data values I have?. If it helps my Log2 FC values range from 0.5 to 2.30 and my -log10 pvalues range from 1.35 to 9.69

• 0 views • link

written 6.3 years ago by peter.berry5 •

1 answer

I see - thanks. The issue there is that EnhancedVolcano will perform the -log10 calculation for you, internally. So, you just need to pass the p-values to it.

• 0 views • link

written 6.3 years ago by Kevin Blighe

Kevin,

Thanks for that help. It works beautifully now. Can I just check if the dataframe must be called "res1" and the names of the X and Y columns in res1 must be called "Log2_FoldChange" and "pvalue"? The reason I ask is that I have several experiments summarised in the one dataframe and obviously can't have multiple columns with the same name. It's not an issue I just want to be clear about the naming requirements.

• 0 views • link

written 6.3 years ago by peter.berry5 •

Hey, no, they can be called anything. So, for one occasion, you can try:

EnhancedVolcano(
  toptable = res1,
    lab = 'res1$HGNC_Symbol',
    x = 'Log2_FoldChange',
    y = 'pvalue')

For another, it could be:

EnhancedVolcano(
  toptable = resultstable,
    lab = 'rownames(resultstable)',
    x = 'log2FC',
    y = 'p')

• 0 views • link

written 6.3 years ago by Kevin Blighe