how should be coverage track of technical replicates of alignment visualization in BAM format?
Hello,
short read sequence alignment of RNA-seq in Bam format are visulaized using IGV, something is wrong I think, technical replicates of each sample are not exactly same, I mean coverage track of them is not identical even with same data range. Do you know it should be same? or is it normal?
thanks in advance
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Unable to view BAM files in IGV
written by N-may •
-
Best practice for merging across lanes
written by dave •
-
How is it possible to recognize replicates?
written by Lorenzo •
-
BAM index via samtools
written by carolina.santiago.t •
-
how to visualize rna-seq coverage track in igv?
written by Zee_S
-
Whats the Difference between variants and SNPs in IGV?(or in general)
written by tmrhyd •
-
which package should be selected for differential gene expression analysis
written by lkianmehr
-
Difference in BAM coverage between bedtools output and IGV coverage track
written by myology •
-
How to deal with (combine) technical replicates (FPKM vs Read count data) for RNA-Seq experiments?
written by Ameya Kulkarni •
-
How to find the differences in aligned bam files
written by 1769mkc
If you load BAM files they are basically never the same which is normal and expected as read counts between files are never 100% the same. If one BAM has 20% fewer reads it gets 20% reduced signal given the samples were truely identical. Please search the web towards the topic
normalization.How to add images to a Biostars post