This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
differences between Illumina Platinum Variant Calls and NIST variant calls

Hi All,

I am validating a bioinformatics pipeline for SNP and INDEL calling. For this purpose I mapped the reads from Illumina Platinum Genome (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERR194147) to hg38 assembly (ftp://ftp.1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp/technical/reference/GRCh38_reference_genome/) and called variants on a smaller subset region chr19:29,207,790-29,217,448. To verify the detection of these variants I used two data sets

  1. From Illumina Platinum Genome (ftp://platgene_ro@ussd-ftp.illumina.com/2017-1.0/hg38/hybrid/)
  2. From NIST (ftp://ftp-trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/giab/ftp/release/NA12878_HG001/latest/GRCh38/)

There is one variant at location chr19 :29215367 which is detected by variant calling pipeline at frequency > 50%. This variant is present in NIST variant dataset but not in illumina platinum genome.

This variant is also present in the CRAM (ftp://ftp.1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp/data_collections/illumina_platinum_pedigree/data/CEU/NA12878/alignment/) file downloaded from Illumina PG site at frequency 54% as visualized by IGV. variant-in-igv

Should I use NIST variants instead of Illumina PG, as this variant will be shown as False Positive.

Can I merge both these dataets to get more comprehensive variant call. Will it be advisable to merge the two datasets?

I will appreciate an insight into this.

snp vcf

Please see How to add images to a Biostars post to add your images properly. You need the direct link to the image, not the link to the webpage that has the image embedded (which is what you have used here)

I have edited my post. Thank you !!

Running into similar issues here; Did you ever get this solved..?

0 answers

No answers yet.

Log in to answer this question.