Do you recommend a method for checking the quality of an assembly vs. transcriptome besides mapping the reads to the assembly and seeing the % that maps?
I'm running the Dropseq pipeline on a de-novo assembled diatom with gene calls from Maker. The pipeline suggests using STAR-aligner for the read mapping. The only problem is that I'm getting a REALLY low mapping.
Does anybody know if there are parameters I can adjust for this particular dataset in STAR or another aligner designed to specifically address these types of issues?
Here is my command:
STAR --genomeDir star_index_extended --readFilesIn unaligned_mc_tagged_polyA_filtered.fastq --outFileNamePrefix star_ --runThreadN 16 --outFilterScoreMinOverLread 0 --outFilterMatchNminOverLread 0 --outFilterMatchNmin 50 --outReadsUnmapped Fastx
Here is the summary output:
bash-4.1$ cat star_Log.final.out
Started job on | May 10 14:58:11
Started mapping on | May 10 14:58:16
Finished on | May 10 20:57:36
Mapping speed, Million of reads per hour | 85.18
Number of input reads | 510139798
Average input read length | 57
UNIQUE READS:
Uniquely mapped reads number | 9914109
Uniquely mapped reads % | 1.94%
Average mapped length | 58.89
Number of splices: Total | 689950
Number of splices: Annotated (sjdb) | 0
Number of splices: GT/AG | 415996
Number of splices: GC/AG | 11503
Number of splices: AT/AC | 297
Number of splices: Non-canonical | 262154
Mismatch rate per base, % | 4.32%
Deletion rate per base | 0.07%
Deletion average length | 1.54
Insertion rate per base | 0.03%
Insertion average length | 1.64
MULTI-MAPPING READS:
Number of reads mapped to multiple loci | 11525318
% of reads mapped to multiple loci | 2.26%
Number of reads mapped to too many loci | 11342282
% of reads mapped to too many loci | 2.22%
UNMAPPED READS:
% of reads unmapped: too many mismatches | 0.00%
% of reads unmapped: too short | 84.30%
% of reads unmapped: other | 9.27%
CHIMERIC READS:
Number of chimeric reads | 0
% of chimeric reads | 0.00%
1 answer
"Too short" usually means "didn't map". Are you sure this is an appropriate reference genome?
Have you eyeballed your reads to see if they make sense?
I'm getting some interesting mapping results when using bwa to map against the reference genome. Will need to talk to the rest of the team to figure out the details between different experiments. Thanks!
Sample Mapped Unmapped Total Ratio Mapped
Fresh 50337077 459841575 510178652 0.098665589
13 21809 279292 301101 0.072430845
14 32791 554770 587561 0.055808673
15 5217 56826 62043 0.084086843
21 4750237 1375941 6126178 0.775399768
Log in to answer this question.
can you provide some stats on the input fastq file you are using?
What other stats would be useful to add here? I think the only one
STARoutputs regarding this is:Average mapped length | 58.89but I can run another tool as well.yes, but i mean more in the line of length of your input reads etc (eg. something that you would get from running fastQC or such)
Try setting --outFilterMatchNmin to 20 to see if you can get more mapping. However, that means it only requires 20 bases to map, which is pretty low.