Thanks for your comment and the provided links. Below is the link to the Ymax=20 https://hmaryam0.wixsite.com/seurat
The problem that I have is that my mt% is not consistent and it is separated to 2 parts. There are also low% MTs with high read counts. I do not have high mt% in particular, but I have very strange mt% and I am not sure if that is the result of the experiment or the nature of the human embryonic stem cell it self. Does it make sense to remove cells that have below 1.75% mt and only keep those with 1.75-6% mt%?

Please read and follow How to add images to a Biostars post. I did the changes in the toplevel question for you this time.
Hi Maria, were you ever able to figure out what caused this? We're seeing a very similar thing with 10X hESC data of our own: Around 50% of our cells have very low, or even 0 percent.mt. The distribution is clearly bimodal. The cells look happy otherwise (similar nUMI and nFeatures), and importantly the low mito cells aren't a distinct celltype, but rather we see a low and high mito cluster for each of our celltypes (this is confirmed with marker genes). Any hints you have would be most appreciated, because we have no idea what this could be.
do they have the same cell cycle status? GSEA of metabolic pathways for the marker genes of the low-mito vs. high-mito group of the same celltype would be interesting
Based on Seurat cell cycle inference, they do: all span G1, G2M, and S. GSEA would indeed be interesting. Thanks for the idea!
also, I assume these are cell lines? I've seen very clear bimodal populations for mito-content in spatial transcriptomics data from a tissue section where everything immediately fell into place once we looked at the image and saw very clearly that the two mito-content-populations corresponded to histologically/phenotypically distinct cell types
It seems such low mt% clusters could be found in many datasets.