Hi there,
This is just a small question I hope! My OMA run has completed and I appear to have all of the files I am supposed to have in the Output directory bar one: used_splicing_variants.txt.
I specified in parameters.drw "UseOnlyOneSplicingVariant := true;" and provided the splicing information for each genome in DB as specified in the manual....
i.e. genome1.fa, genome1.fa.splice, genome2.fa, genome2.fa.splice etc
7 of the 9 genomes we are investigating have detailed splicing information, 1 has very limited and the remaining genome has precisely 0. The .splice files were provided for each with an empty one for the genome where this information was not available.
In this case - has OMA defaulted to inferring alternative splicing variants as paralogs?
Many thanks, Nicki
•
written
by
nc52 •
1 answer
Hi Nicki,
yes, for genomes that do not have splicing information, all the protein sequences are treated as independable genes and are most likely inferred as paralogs. One reason why they might not is due to very different lengths, in which case OMA might decide not to call them as orthologs/paralogs.
Best wishes, Adrian
Log in to answer this question.
-
Methods for calculation of TMB via GENIE/cBioPortal data
written by Andrew •
-
Obtaining every"Protein ID" from a genome in OMA
written by christyh •
-
To generate genome-wise orthologs including paralogs from OMA
written by mzzzzzzzzzz •
-
Transcritomes comparison - How can you get a weighted mapping given two species?
written by Yotam ConstantiniBiostar •
-
ERROR UTR only implemented with shadow and partial or complete. Augustus
written by 18140010 •
-
STAR genome indexing with multiple gff3 files
written by guylab •
-
OMA error in reading the all-against-all files
written by nc52 •
-
Calculating sequencing errors
written by khanirfanbioinformatics •
-
STAR Aligner Suddently changed output file???
written by jack.baines2 •
-
OMA parameter error Message
written by chevivien
