The CIViC database: Why there are some evidence items with Level A but only 3 stars
Currently there are four evidence items with Level A but only 3 stars.
An example is https://civicdb.org/events/genes/24/summary/variants/55/summary/evidence/190/summary#evidence
The Evidence Level is: A - Validated
However the Evidence Rating is 3-star.
And there's no any evidence talking with it.
Whether should we trust such evidences?
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Forum: Recursive reasoning for variant pathogenicity: early results show promise, need domain exper…
written by Pranava •
-
Feasibility of detecting PCR-chimeric reads with Machine Learing (ML) for organelle genome assembli…
written by moreDanOne •
-
Several questions for genereating human genome assembly
written by tungsega •
-
Blog: Using Long-read Sequencing Technology to Explore the Complex Structure of Transcripts
written by Novogene •
-
Aberrant splicing in bulk RNAseq
written by txema.heredia •
-
The number of unique SNPs and indels in Clinvar
written by Manuel •
-
Feature Selection in Large Dataset with High Multicollinearity
written by KernelGhost •
-
BSc Thesis "Machine learning application in diagnosis of a genetic diseases" - Is that valid?
written by mat646 •
-
Error running /usr/local/bin/tophat_reports
written by Cricket •
-
Forum: Kai Wang of Annovar and PennCNV uses this
written by Istvan Albert
