comparison e-value from pairwise alignment to blastp
I have to do pairwise alignment in the platform BLAST for two proteins: OMP40_PORGI and OMP41_PORGI. After that, I am asked to compare the e-value I found from option alignment two or more in BLASTp, by adding the two fasta formats of the proteins in nr databases, to the e-value I found from pairwise alignment. The thing is in pairwise alignment I have to enter the RequestID , which comes to a result identical to the other. so no comparison .. the only that I thought is that my lab professor is trying to 'show' us it is the same thing.
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Query coverage high, E-value low, and identity low - Blastp results interpretation and article reco…
written by Luana JBC •
-
BLAST e-value between two sequences vs BLAST e-value between sequence and data base
written by nyanovsky •
-
Question about blastp result
written by huiyus97 •
-
How come Alignment length is longer than Subject sequence length?
written by jth6974 •
-
Why does some hits that show up in search against smaller database, but does not show up in entire …
written by sajal •
-
The relationship between e-value and percent identity
written by karn_heera990 •
-
Software for ungapped local alignment with custom substitution matrix
written by cl10101 •
-
E Values Using Blastp In Biopython
written by juliet.hannah •
-
Need Help Filling In A Webform And Downloading A Dataset Via Perl
written by sumanxiu •
-
How To Force Blastp To Display All The Possible Combination Of Alignments?
written by Rein •
