Dealing with C>T technical issues (from FFPE samples) in SNP analysis
0
1
Entering edit mode
5.4 years ago
dodausp ▴ 180

Hi all, I have always wondered why C>T transitions are frequently high when performing SNP analysis, and even more evident when looking for somatic signatures. I have only worked with FFPE samples, so it never crossed mind that the fixation procedure might be the problem, until I found this (Do et al, 2013):

...we also observed that C:G>T:A SNCs often accounted for 50% of all artifactual SNCs in FFPE DNA samples.

That explains a lot!

So, considering this alarmingly high rate of artifacts, I believe that people account for that error and somehow filter them out. That being said, is there any procedure/script/package to overcome this issue?

Any help is much appreciated!

SNP base deamination FFPE mutational signature • 1.1k views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1807 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6