Dear users,
Does someone can explain the curve shape of GSEA analysis enrichement profile? As control of my GSEA analysis with PreRanked data set following Log2FoldChange, I did the same analysis but with Log2FoldChange randomly attributed to genes of my data set. The consequence is that, in the interrogated genes sets, I have systematically lower ES values and much higher FDR (>25%) in the control GSEA analysis which is really consistent.
However, the curve shape of the enrichment profile is always (in all genes sets) with the peak offset to the left of the graph.. and this also for my control GSEA analysis... I cannot understand the basis of this, and why in the control one it does not acquire completely random shape (with peak in the middle for ex.)
Can you help me to make up my mind with this?
Thank you !
•
written
by
gregoire.destreel •
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
-
Preranked GSEA permutation
written by as823jk •
-
Use of Pval v.s. Padj Statistic in Pre-Ranked GSEA Analysis
written by BioTinker •
-
GSEA test
written by jackson9 •
-
Dealing with very large gene-lists in GSEA
written by yura.grabovska •
-
Using of GSEA to compare RNA seq data with published gene sets?
written by Fedo •
-
GSEA analaysis understaning
written by kanwarjag
-
The shape of my ... enrichment profile !?
written by gregoire.destreel •
-
Why all NES values are >0.5
written by gregoire.destreel •
-
GSEA following DESeq2
written by sup230 •
-
Which plan is more reasonable, gsea on total dataset , on subset of total dataset with DEG or preRa…
written by Shamim Sarhadi
Hello gregoire.destreel!
Questions similar to yours can already be found at:
We have closed your question to allow us to keep similar content in the same thread.
If you disagree with this please tell us why in a reply below. We'll be happy to talk about it.
Cheers!