This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Are TCGA data from UCSC cancer browser and TCGAbiolinks different?

Hi there,

I downloaded TCGA BRCA RNAseq data from UCSC cancer browser or used TCGAbiolinks:

library(TCGAbiolinks)
query <- GDCquery(project = 'TCGA-BRCA', data.category = 'Transcriptome Profiling', data.type = 'Gene Expression Quantification', workflow.type = 'HTSeq - Counts')
GDCdownload(query)
brca.seq <- GDCprepare(query)

And checked the expression of SOX10:

library(DESeq2)
r = rowData(brca.seq)
as.numeric(assay(brca.seq[which(r$external_gene_name == 'SOX10'),]))

It turns out its expression is zero in all patients. But in data from UCSC cancer browser (HiSeqV2) SOX10 average expression is 6. The data from UCSC can be found here: https://tcga.xenahubs.net/download/TCGA.BRCA.sampleMap/HiSeqV2.gz

Another question, TCGAbiolinks is more updated than UCSC caner browser as it directly downloads data from TCGA right?

Thank you!

tcga rna-seq

1 answer

Hello,

Can you please tell me how you are seeing that the expression is 6 in UCSC Xena? For me I see that it is 0 for all samples in the GDC TCGA BRCA cohort: https://xenabrowser.net/?bookmark=1c841f9f54e697573dc2d9aa5b6be22b (sorry about the red color, it is because Xena is not sure how to color the samples when they are all the same value)

While technically the data from TCGAbiolinks will be more up-to-date than UCSC Xena, for this particular data there is unlikely to be a lag since it has been out for a long time.

Best, Mary

the legacy TCGA data came from hg19 version and TCGA data from the GDC now use hg38 version. therefore, it will have some difference.

Log in to answer this question.