Biostar Beta. Not for public use.
Question: What is ERCC spike-in really saying about my sequencing run?
Entering edit mode

I've used ERCC spike-in to prep the library for my recent run of sc-RNA seq.

Looking at the plot of ERCC read counts vs ERCC concentration, I know we should ideally expect to see a nice correlation with R2 =1, for every sample in the library.

Looking at the sequences itself, QC and mapping %, I've had a bad run. Slopes of the ERCC plot are all over the board and anywhere from 0 to 1. What specifically does this ERCC plot really indicate about the sequencing run? Besides that "something went wrong" or that samples aren't evenly amplified? - How should I rectify this?

While we're at this, can someone explain or point me to a good resource on how to use ERCC counts to normalise my data?

Thank you!

ADD COMMENTlink 17 months ago exin • 50
Entering edit mode

It's not new. These ERCC spike-ins don't behave as one would expect and I do not know how they found their way to the marketplace. The company selling them will have some pristine plots to show, of course. As such, they cannot be trusted, and I would not actually encourage you to use them for normalisation.

ADD REPLYlink 17 months ago
Kevin Blighe
Entering edit mode

Thank you for your insights Kevin!

ADD REPLYlink 17 months ago
• 50

Login before adding your answer.

Similar Posts
Loading Similar Posts
Powered by the version 2.0