Biostar Beta. Not for public use.
Question: What is ERCC spike-in really saying about my sequencing run?
0
Entering edit mode

I've used ERCC spike-in to prep the library for my recent run of sc-RNA seq.

Looking at the plot of ERCC read counts vs ERCC concentration, I know we should ideally expect to see a nice correlation with R2 =1, for every sample in the library.

Looking at the sequences itself, QC and mapping %, I've had a bad run. Slopes of the ERCC plot are all over the board and anywhere from 0 to 1. What specifically does this ERCC plot really indicate about the sequencing run? Besides that "something went wrong" or that samples aren't evenly amplified? - How should I rectify this?

While we're at this, can someone explain or point me to a good resource on how to use ERCC counts to normalise my data?

Thank you!

ADD COMMENTlink 17 months ago exin • 50
Entering edit mode
1

It's not new. These ERCC spike-ins don't behave as one would expect and I do not know how they found their way to the marketplace. The company selling them will have some pristine plots to show, of course. As such, they cannot be trusted, and I would not actually encourage you to use them for normalisation.

ADD REPLYlink 17 months ago
Kevin Blighe
43k
Entering edit mode
1

Thank you for your insights Kevin!

ADD REPLYlink 17 months ago
exin
• 50

Login before adding your answer.

Similar Posts
Loading Similar Posts
Powered by the version 2.0