This reply is better suited as a comment on <answerer>'s answer. Could you make the appropriate change please? That would involve the following steps:
- Copy the contents of your reply from this answer
- Click on
Add Commenton my post here: C: RNA seq Adapter calculation - Paste the copied text
- Click on the green
Add Commentbutton - Click on
moderateback in your answer here: <link> - Choose
Delete Post - Click on the blue
Submitbutton.
Thank you!
I suppose
adapter metricsis just the number and percentage of reads containing adapters, and the number and percentage of bases removed. Do you want more information than that?I know bbduk output these stats, and some more if you use the parameter
stats=file.txt. I beieve Trimmomatic (and probably other programs) also outputs similar metrics.Hello,
Thank you for that information. So I am guessing that the adapter metrics looks let the number of reads that have adapters even after trimming?
So would it be possible to call the adapter metrics that is calculated as contamination of the reads with adapters after trimming?
Would the RNA-SeQC do the same, curious about this since I found this on a NIH website??
Thank you, thekid
When one trims adapters, the intention is to remove all of them, because they are noise, not signal. If the adapter was not removed, it is because the software didn't recognize it - so the same software which removed adapters can't quantify left-over adapters. So I guess adapter metrics refer to adapter contamination before adapter removal, not after.