Losing somatic SNPs
I got circa 130 high confidence somatic SNP, comparing tumor and blood samples with VarScan. I wanted to annotate them so I passed the data to VarAft, but it gives me just 6 variations. What am I doing wrong? Is there a tool that gives me the info i can get with VarAft?
snp
varscan
varaft
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Different NGS runs for paired samples
written by gab •Hello everyone I ask you help because I'm in a situation I struggle with. I am working o a project with the aim to find …
-
How to merge vcf files (output of VarScan2 somatic)?
written by RahelehHello, I have WES data of tumor samples with matched ones extracted from 13 patients (paired-end, illumina). I used BWA mem to align them against …
-
Problem understanding GT from Varscan's vcf output
written by ww22runner •Hello all, I am trying to look for somatic variants in paired tumor/normal samples and have been using Varscan's somatic and processSomatic commands to obtain …
-
high frequency SNPs (and other variations) after subtracting blood variants from tumor ones
written by gab •Hi everybody! DISCLAIMER: I am new and very glad to join this community, therefore I will gladly accept all answers that pointing out I have …
-
converting varscan2 output to sequenza
written by a01039012387 •Hi. I'm trying to run a sequenza with the output of varscan2 I used VarScan version of 2.4.3 and put into sequenza but I got …
-
Urgent request - Pipeline for finding somatic and germline mutations of a cancer patient
written by WhoknowsHi all, This project belong to a patient and I need some fast helps for the analysis I have 2 WES samples from him, one …
-
Meerkat for identification of somatic structural variations for paired samples
written by haiying.kong************************************************************************************************** Apparently, I did not read through the manual carefully. somatic_sv.pl has some parameters that provide information for normal genome. ************************************************************************************************** I am trying to …
-
Comparing samtools,gatk and varscan against gold standard 1000G snps and need to decide the best me…
written by bioinforesearchquestionsDear All, For three samples, I generated vcf files using samtools, gatk, and varscan. I tried accessing the files 1000G_phase1_high_confidence_snps.vcf, it has only following columns …
-
Why do people not call normal and tumor variant separately for somatic mutation identification?
written by DVA<p>Hello,</p> <p>I have been using VarScan and MuTect to call somatic variants. Lately, of curiosity, I also tried to call variants separately for the tumor …
-
Can we do unsupervised clustering of Varscan output based on variant frequencies?
written by ivivek_ngsDear All, I have some queries regarding the Varscan output. I have some varscan output files where I am trying to understand two different kind …
Have you thought in annotating this file with other tool than VarAft. If it works for all your variants, the problem is with VarAft. It it works for your 6 variants only, the problem is in your input file.
It may be helpful to give us a sample of your somatic variants here.
This is some example of .snp output from VarScan. Annotating with VEP gives no problems.
Are these coordinates on GRCh37 or GRCh38? If the VEP runs fine with your input file, the chances are there is something going on with VarScan.
Can you compare the 6 positions that work with VarScan with the ones that do not work? What is different between this two groups?
It turned out bam files were generated with a different fasta instead of the one I used to get the mpileups, this lead to indexing problems and all SNPs were misplaced. Tahnks to everybody for the help!
Does the tool remove variants that are unlikely to be related to disease? If so, I would not be surprised that the majority of mutations got eliminated. Most somatic mutations have no causality towards the disease but are passengers.