Okey, I will try UMI-tools without removing the barcode and see if it works. Thanks!
Hello, I am demultiplexing some samples with bcl2fastq and I wonder if it is possible to avoid the addition of the barcode sequence to the header of the reads.
Many thanks, Goren
P.D: In the next steps I will use UMI-tools for adding the UMI sequence to the header, so I need to get rid of the barcode first.
2 answers
UMI-tools is perfectly happy with having the Illumina barcode in the normal spot, it adds UMIs to the read names.
It worked!! Thank you very much
My fastqs have no barcodes in their header. (bcl2fastq v2.19.403) Only undetermined samples have that.
How do you know which index the sample has then?
I trust the sample sheet to have that information correct.
I have never seen a bcl2fastq demultiplexed file without the index sequence transferred to the fastq header. Perhaps you are using a bcl2fastq option I am unaware of or are post processing files to remove the index sequence from fastq headers.
Nope. No special options, no post processing. Version 2.19 if I remember right. Indices are included in the undetermined fastq file, but not the sample fastqs.
Actually, I see that it depends on the instrument. I run the same version and command line of bcl2fastq on the Miseq, and I see indices in the headers, but my Hiseq1000 fastq files do not have indices in the headers
Log in to answer this question.
I don't think you can (if you are truly demultiplexing the data using
bcl2fastq). You will need to do it after the fact.