Can we concatenate two fastq files from same sample but different runs
Hi,
I have two paired end file sets for a sample.
Forward: sample_R1_001.fastq.gz, sample_R1_002.fastq.gz
Reverse sample_R2_001.fastq.gz, sample_R2_002.fastq.gz
This is not a multilane case. They were two separate runs from the same sample aliquot!!
- Should I concat R1_001 and R1_002 fastq files ?
- Or should I run them as two separate pipelines?
- Or should I run them separately till alignment and then do BAM merge like for multilane samples?
Thanks, Payal
• 5,934 views
•
link
1 answer
If I am not wrong, --no-lane-splitting is only available for bcl2fastq2, not for the bcl2fastq.
• 0 views
•
link
Log in to answer this question.
Whether a separate run or separate lane makes little difference, they are still technical replicates. They should not be merged.
I have not seen any lane practical lane effects. Illumina offers a
--no-lane-splittingoption for their post processing software (bcl2fastq) which will make a single file per sample, if the same pool ran across multiple lanes of a flowcell.s/should not be/should be/But is this the case also for variant calling? I remember in GATK they take care for lane in their analysis (case of de-multiplexed).
There are no appreciable lane effects any more so they have nothing to adjust.