This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Can we concatenate two fastq files from same sample but different runs

Hi,

I have two paired end file sets for a sample.

Forward: sample_R1_001.fastq.gz, sample_R1_002.fastq.gz

Reverse sample_R2_001.fastq.gz, sample_R2_002.fastq.gz

This is not a multilane case. They were two separate runs from the same sample aliquot!!

  1. Should I concat R1_001 and R1_002 fastq files ?
    1. Or should I run them as two separate pipelines?
    2. Or should I run them separately till alignment and then do BAM merge like for multilane samples?

Thanks, Payal

sequencing rna-seq

Whether a separate run or separate lane makes little difference, they are still technical replicates. They should not be merged.

Whether a separate run or separate lane makes little difference, they are still technical replicates. They should not be merged.

I have not seen any lane practical lane effects. Illumina offers a --no-lane-splitting option for their post processing software (bcl2fastq) which will make a single file per sample, if the same pool ran across multiple lanes of a flowcell.

s/should not be/should be/

But is this the case also for variant calling? I remember in GATK they take care for lane in their analysis (case of de-multiplexed).

However, if you are generating multiple libraries for each sample, and/or multiplexing samples within and/or across sequencing lanes, the data must be de-multiplexed before pre-processing, typically resulting in multiple sets of FASTQ files per sample all of which should have distinct read group IDs (RGID).

There are no appreciable lane effects any more so they have nothing to adjust.

1 answer

If I am not wrong, --no-lane-splitting is only available for bcl2fastq2, not for the bcl2fastq.

Log in to answer this question.