After ChIP, is there more DNA in treated samples than untreated control samples?
Hi Guys,
Just based on your ChIP-seq experience, do you usually see big variances of DNA amounts (nanodrop/picogreen readouts) between control and treated samples. I'm doing TF ChIP. Theoretically, there are more TF-bounded fragments in treated samples, so the DNA concentration after ChIP should be high. In contrast, the unstimulated control should have a low number of fragments to IP, so the nanodrop readouts should be low. Is it true in real case?
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Tutorial: Premade library preparation – considerations, tips and tricks (II)
written by Novogene •
-
Expression thresholds for enrichment analysis of RNA-Seq data
written by James Cook •
-
Single-sample methylation region-finder packages
written by Papyrus
-
Possible reason for no peaks generated by MACS2
written by Louis Kok •
-
ChIPseq - Identical peaks in IP and input samples
written by dorota.komar •
-
How do I normalize for my RNA-seq data across different samples in different conditions
written by crzy_azn_sean •
-
How to deal with low-depth ChIP-seq / ATAC-seq samples
written by Vanilla
-
Understanding ATAC-seq data
written by Friederike
-
Is it necessary to normalize sequencing data BEFORE input into MACS for ChIP-seq??
written by nash.claire
-
Modeling Chip-Seq Background Using Edger'S Glm Functionality?
written by Ryan Thompson
This question is not directly related to bioinformatics and would be appropriate for SeqAnswers.com or biology stackexchange forums.