This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
bbmap paired-end alignment problem

Hi All

I'm having a problem with aligning Illumina PE reads with BBMap version 35.92.

Execution of

bbmap.sh overwrite=t ref=Z.fasta in=R1_001_val_1.100.fq in2=R2_001_val_2.100.fq minid=0.25 mappedonly=true out=out.sam  outu=unaligned_reads.fa maxindel=100000

yields out.sam which contains only alignments of read1 even though the log info seems to suggest read2 reads were also aligned

Pairing data:           pct reads       num reads       pct bases          num bases

mated pairs:            100.0000%             100       107.4763%              59558
bad pairs:                0.0000%               0         0.0000%                  0
insert size avg:          412.82


Read 1 data:            pct reads       num reads       pct bases          num bases

mapped:                 100.0000%             100       100.0000%              29779
unambiguous:            100.0000%             100       100.0000%              29779
ambiguous:                0.0000%               0         0.0000%                  0
low-Q discards:           0.0000%               0         0.0000%                  0

perfect best site:        0.0000%               0         0.0000%                  0
semiperfect site:        35.0000%              35        35.1758%              10475
rescued:                  0.0000%               0

Match Rate:                   NA               NA        88.8176%              26449
Error Rate:              65.0000%              65         4.4763%               1333
Sub Rate:                65.0000%              65         0.3627%                108
Del Rate:                 0.0000%               0         0.0000%                  0
Ins Rate:                49.0000%              49         4.1136%               1225
N Rate:                 100.0000%             100         6.7061%               1997


Read 2 data:            pct reads       num reads       pct bases          num bases

mapped:                 100.0000%             100       100.0000%              25636
unambiguous:            100.0000%             100       100.0000%              25636
ambiguous:                0.0000%               0         0.0000%                  0
low-Q discards:           0.0000%               0         0.0000%                  0

perfect best site:        0.0000%               0         0.0000%                  0
semiperfect site:        26.0000%              26        25.3745%               6505
rescued:                  2.0000%               2

Match Rate:                   NA               NA        86.8232%              22258
Error Rate:              74.0000%              74         4.9852%               1278
Sub Rate:                74.0000%              74         0.8894%                228
Del Rate:                 0.0000%               0         0.0000%                  0
Ins Rate:                42.0000%              42         4.0958%               1050
N Rate:                 100.0000%             100         8.1916%               2100

As a test I then tried

bbmap.sh overwrite=t ref=Z.fasta in=R2_001_val_2.100.fq minid=0.25 mappedonly=true out=out.sam  outu=unaligned_reads.fa maxindel=100000

Here read2 reads were aligned.

Any ideas what is wrong with the first command line for the paired-end reads?

Thanks

Mark

bbmap align paired-end
• 5,196 views • link
written by mark.rose • mark.rose

What is the output of:

samtools view -f 0x0040 out.sam | wc -l

and

samtools view -f 0x0080 out.sam | wc -l
• 0 views • link
written by h.mon h.mon 
[rosema1@demeter trunk]$ samtools view -f 0x0040 out.sam | wc -l
[bam_header_read] EOF marker is absent. The input is probably truncated.
[bam_header_read] invalid BAM binary header (this is not a BAM file).
[main_samview] fail to read the header from "out.sam".
0
[rosema1@demeter trunk]$ samtools view -f 0x0080 out.sam | wc -l
[bam_header_read] EOF marker is absent. The input is probably truncated.
[bam_header_read] invalid BAM binary header (this is not a BAM file).
[main_samview] fail to read the header from "out.sam".
0

I also tried 

samtools view -o out.bam out.sam
[bam_header_read] EOF marker is absent. The input is probably truncated.
[bam_header_read] invalid BAM binary header (this is not a BAM file).
[main_samview] fail to read the header from "out.sam".

I just noticed that the sam file has as many lines as it should given paired-end reads and that there are 2 lines for every read ID but they are both labeled, for instance, "M00645:16:000000000-B666D:1:1101:18619:5889 1:N:0:48", though they are different sequences. Going back to the fastq files I find the sequence for read1 in the read1 fastq file ( with, of course the ID above). When I look for read2 in the read2 file, I find the base ID above and the sequence is as it is in the sam file except it is reverse complemented.

• 0 views • link
updated by GenoMax GenoMax • written by mark.rose • mark.rose

It is as I suspected, bbmap removes the trailing /1 and /2, but keeps track of first read and second read using sam flags. However, I don't know why the samtools command is failing, which version of samtools are you using?

• 0 views • link
written by h.mon h.mon

I checked the FLAG and you are indeed correct, one is read1 and the other read2 despite their QNAMEs. So I guess all is fine, if unexpected, in regard to the representation of paired-ends. Thanks for your help.

As for samtools, I'm using version 0.1.19-44428cd.

• 0 views • link
written by mark.rose • mark.rose

You really need to upgrade to the latest samtools (now v.1.7). That version is ancient and can only lead to other troubles.

• 0 views • link
written by GenoMax GenoMax

mark.rose : If you have samtools available in your $PATH you can directly create bam files by specifying out=myfile.bam when running bbmap.

• 0 views • link
written by GenoMax GenoMax

Not that it matters for the original question, but with .sam files, it should be samtools view -S -f 0x0040 out.sam, or has that changed in a recent version?

• 0 views • link
written by cschu181 cschu181

0 answers

No answers yet.

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this