I like CWL, and would like to use it in a production setting. I am coming from a Make approach, whereby output is not remade unless datestamps of input determine this to be necessary. I cannot find any documentation on this aspect for CWL. I have read the 'Gentle Intro' twice end-to-end thinking this was an oversight of mine. Can someone direct me to docs if extant, or give insight if not? Googling doesn't come up with anything either. I would like to avoid going all-in on Make, it's not particularly user-friendly.
Many thanks,
Bruce.
•
written
by
bruce.moran
Hi Bruce,
I also did not find any official documentation about caching system. I have been using CWL for processing dozens of genomic files with the cwl-runner software (https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool). It has a working caching system. Here is how I run this software in production setting:
cwl-runner --tmpdir-prefix tmp/ --cachedir cache/ --outdir results/ workflow.cwl job.yml
cwl-runner - CWL reference implementation executor--tmpdir-prefix tmp/ - Write temporary files at tmp directory at working directory instead of using /tmp directory.--cachedir cache/ - Write cache files at cache directory at working directory. It will be used when rerun the same command line, reducing processing time for already processed files. There are some known issues (https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool/issues/493).--outdir results/ - Write result files at results directory at working directory.OK, very interesting. Your issue on Github is only a few months old, and caching is described as 'experimental' in the response, so I don't think this is going to be useful for production work I will be doing. Hopefully this will be part of next updates. Many thanks for the input, and the example.
Hello bruce.moran,
The CWL reference implementation cwltool is not designed for production usage. For that, check out one of the other implementations: http://www.commonwl.org/#Implementations
FYI: cwl-runner is the generic way to run any CWL executor, it could refer to cwltool, arvados, rabix bunny, cwltoil, or others :-)
Cheers,
Thanks Michael, appreciate your input.
Log in to answer this question.
yes reentrancy is one of those things the make crowd takes for granted but the workbench people find especially challenging to implement
Only have a few months using Make so was assessing the alternatives. I read your paper on this, so appreciate your experience. Do you have anything written on your own preferred solution, especially for production?
though I've never tested CWL with either of these tools - both Toil https://toil.readthedocs.io/en/3.10.0/running/cwl.html and Nextflow https://github.com/nextflow-io/cwl2nxf offer some support for CWL and are reentrant