Hello everyone, I wonder why there is a different between the number of probes after I process the data from GEO in CEL compared to SOFT files. For example, data set GSM272923 just have 18382 probes as described in the table near the end of the page while as I downloaded CEL file, there were 54675 probes?
Your help would be really appreciated!
Dataset GSM272923 from GSE10810: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM272923
My code to process the CEL files:
RAWstr = "GSE10810_RAW.tar"
RAWdirectory = paste("./RAWsets", substr(RAWstr, 1, nchar(RAWstr) - 8), sep = "/")
tardir = paste("./RAWsets", RAWstr, sep = "/")
untar(tardir, exdir = RAWdirectory, verbose = F)
cels = list.files(RAWdirectory, pattern = "CEL.gz", full.names = T)
sapply(cels, gunzip)
data.raw = ReadAffy(filenames = substr(cels, 1, nchar(cels)-3), verbose = F, cdfname = "hgu133plus2cdf")
data.matrix = rma(data.raw)
tmp = exprs(data.matrix)
2 answers
The original submitters apparently filtered the data. That is not uncommon.
Those 18K probes could be the result of significance tests between a P-value of 0-1, and may included duplicated probes.
The paper should clue you into your questions, like what is contained in the M&M section.
Log in to answer this question.