This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
extracting targe genes of a list of TFs

hi,

supposing a list of TFs and their targets as below

> head(tf2target[,1:2])

   TF                gene

1 AHR            1/2-SBSRNA4

2 AHR           A4GALT

3 AHR           AAMP

4 AHR           AANAT

and a list of 35 TFs, how I can extract targets of these 35 TFs from above list?

thank you for any suggestion

gene r
• 2,310 views • link
written by zizigolu zizigolu

mergedFile <- merge(tf2target, listof35TFs, by="TF")

• 0 views • link
written by zizigolu zizigolu

1 answer

mergedFile <- merge(tf2target, listof35TFs, by="TF")

• 0 views • link
written by zizigolu zizigolu

Hey Istvan Albert , I think this person is gaming the system again. We should really try and set the points to "answer your own question" to 0.

• 0 views • link
written by Ram Ram

sorry Ram,, but answering my own question won't add any score for me. I am not gaming

I was really this question but suddenly remembered in this post C: find matching gene symbol EagleEye answered such a question then I used that and for future (might be for myself again) I shared the answer.

I really can't understand your manner toward me, I am not a gamer, I am only a simple student who studied pure agriculture and now trying to learn working with computational tools.

might be my previous deeds in this website cuased you think so about me, but I am not the same student anymore, Jena failure was a good lesson for me...

however @Istvan Albert can ban me from being here, you all right

• 0 views • link
written by zizigolu zizigolu

I am sorry, but I will believe that you're not gaming the system when I don't see gaming behavior. Right now, this one time doesn't prove anything either way, but I weighed your past activities plus detailed the current circumstance (see below) to alert admins to this.

• 0 views • link
written by Ram Ram

I don't think this is a case of gaming the system. But I do think this is a case of "insufficient searching" prior to creating the thread. This seems like a pretty common R problem, for which multiple solutions exist, either from an R tutorial or StackOverflow. So maybe that could be avoided in the future.

I don't have the impression that Fereshteh's rating has gone up a lot since the previous "accident" (let me call it that...). At that point the "incorrect" upvotes weren't reset.

• 0 views • link
written by WouterDeCoster WouterDeCoster

WDC, her points have not gone up, I agree. Prior to the incident, she and another user had a circular upvote thing going, plus she had multiple Scholar trophies (+10 points each) from answering her own questions in immediately after asking them. I look out for such behavior, and unlike the last time, I wish to be aggressive and request it be stopped the moment I see it.

My recommendation was either to make the Scholar trophy points a one time thing, or award no points if the OP and the answerer are the same person, or an intersection of both. I'm learning django right now, and once I get to understand it a bit, I can definitely suggest a code change myself.

• 0 views • link
written by Ram Ram

Hey Fereshteh , given you did not mention the existence of the list listof35TFs, you have a pattern of answering and accepting your own answers only, and you answered this literally 1 hour after you asked it, I have to conclude you're gaming the system. Please do not repeat this.

• 0 views • link
written by Ram Ram

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this