This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
Reads length mouse RNA-seq

Hi,

I am planning to perform RNAseq on mouse samples and I am trying to figure out which would be the best reads length to cover more than one exon-exon junction in order to get isoform. In the literature I found 75bp was used for human sample, would it be fine also for mouse? or I should go for 100bp?

Thanks Pisi

rna-seq
• 2,931 views • link
updated by brent_wilson brent_wilson • written by pisiposo84 pisiposo84

Either should be fine. Longer reads give more precise mapping (in general).

• 1 views • link
written by GenoMax GenoMax

That will depend on his budget... but it's indeed pretty cool.

• 1 views • link
written by WouterDeCoster WouterDeCoster

Yeah, and they won't get any useful (or at least of very limited use) quantification data. Iso-Seq may be better for transcript discovery in a largely unexplored transcriptomes rather than something like mouse.

• 1 views • link
written by spvensko spvensko

I would indeed guess that it's not as quantitative as established illumina RNA-seq. But I disagree that it wouldn't be an added value to characterize the transcriptome of mouse. I'm sure there are many transcripts we haven't discovered or properly annotated yet, definitely in lesser studied/accessible tissues. But we don't know what OP exactly wants to get out of this analysis :p

• 1 views • link
written by WouterDeCoster WouterDeCoster

My mouse RNA-seq was 90 bp. It depends of your resources and what you want.

• 1 views • link
written by tiago211287 tiago211287

1 answer

Hi Pisi,

We handle a lot of RNA-Seq, and read length (really fragment length) is important for crossing the exon-exon junction as you mention. We definitely recommend paired-end reads for this application (though paired-end Illumina reads will also work for differential expression applications). However, there is definitely a point of diminishing returns, due to fragment size:

https://cofactorgenomics.com/what-happens-when-hardware-advances-faster-than-molecular-protocols/

Feel free to also check out our Iso-Seq/PACBIO blog post for an entirely isoform detection method (no D.E.):

https://cofactorgenomics.com/discovery-and-identification-of-fusions-and-isoforms/

Brent Wilson, PhD | Project Scientist | Cofactor Genomics

4044 Clayton Ave. | St. Louis, MO 63110 | tel. 314.531.4647

Catch the latest from Cofactor on our blog.

• 1 views • link
written by brent_wilson brent_wilson

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this