I understand that K-means clustering is used very often for gene expression analysis and usually dissimilarity is measured by euclidean distance but are there any particular applications of in which euclidean distance may not be the most appropriate tool in clustering? Is there any other way dissimilarity in gene expression be measured?
•
written
by
Jay •
1 answer
There are plenty of measures to choose from. See for example the R function dist() for some commonly used ones (the R package proxy has more). The main problem with Euclidean distance is that it quickly tends towards a constant on noisy data as the number of dimensions increases and thus becomes useless. This is known as distance concentration. More on this here. All commonly used distance or similarity measures suffer from it to various degrees. What makes analysis possible despite this is the presence of structures/patterns in the data. In my experience however, the cosine distance (i.e. 1-cos) is more resistant to the concentration phenomenon than others, i.e. in the presence of noise, it may allow you to find meaningful clusters where Euclidean distance would fail.
Log in to answer this question.
-
CytoScape parameters for k-means clustering
written by Phenylananin •
-
pearson correlation or Euclidean distance for clustering?
written by mrashad
-
Which is the proper RNA-seq count table transformation to perform hierarchial clustering analysis?
written by antonioggsousa
-
How to add customized distance to ComplexHeatmap
written by huynguyen96.dnu •
-
Hierarchical clustering to group large number of samples
written by nazaninhoseinkhan
-
Distance between two gene sets
written by The
-
Automatic clustering for gene expressing matrix
written by J.F.Jiang
-
What Tool/Package Would You Recommend For Clustering Large Gene Expression Data?
written by Diwan
-
What Is A Correct Way To Assess Batch Effect?
written by vanzetti •
-
Which Method Is The Best Dissimilarity Measurement For Hierarchical Clustering Of Dna Methylation D…
written by Gangcai
