[cBioPortal] [GATK] [TCGA] Somatic variant calling error
So I have a tumor:match normal sample from TCGA for somatic variant calling using MuTect2.
According to cBioportal, I should see a K319Rfs*26 with an allele frequency for this patient at 0.37. Mind you, variants on cBioportal are not called against its respective matched normal.
When I call variants against its matched normal, however, and using dbSNP, COSMIC...
- I do not see the same mutation (AA change).
- My variants are predominantly present in normal sample
- My variants have embarassingly low AF (< 0.05) whereas ones for TCGA (at cbioportal) are all relatively high >0.3
I suspect that it's not cBioportal that's incorrect and it's me that's making a huge mistake in my pipeline.
My results:
#CHROM POS ID REF ALT QUAL FILTER INFO FORMAT PRAD
1 150900333 . T C . alt_allele_in_normal;clustered_events;t_lod_fstar ECNT=2;HCNT=4;MAX_ED=56;MIN_ED=56;NLOD=23.85;TLOD=4.04 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:105,2:0.019:0:2:0.00:4057,74:51:54
1 150900389 . T C . alt_allele_in_normal;clustered_events ECNT=2;HCNT=4;MAX_ED=56;MIN_ED=56;NLOD=17.57;TLOD=6.39 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:96,3:0.030:3:0:1.00:3710,108:51:45
1 150902490 . T C . alt_allele_in_normal;t_lod_fstar ECNT=1;HCNT=1;MAX_ED=.;MIN_ED=.;NLOD=24.15;TLOD=5.83 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:117,3:0.025:2:1:0.667:4497,105:57:60
1 150913836 . C T . alt_allele_in_normal;clustered_events;t_lod_fstar ECNT=2;HCNT=2;MAX_ED=47;MIN_ED=47;NLOD=25.51;TLOD=4.09 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:111,2:0.018:1:1:0.500:4189,75:52:59
1 150913883 . A G . alt_allele_in_normal;clustered_events;t_lod_fstar ECNT=2;HCNT=2;MAX_ED=47;MIN_ED=47;NLOD=10.37;TLOD=6.17 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:70,3:0.041:0:3:1.00:2702,108:36:34
1 150917537 . T C . alt_allele_in_normal ECNT=1;HCNT=1;MAX_ED=.;MIN_ED=.;NLOD=21.09;TLOD=6.53 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:109,3:0.027:2:1:0.667:3975,111:45:64
17 7571856 . T C . alt_allele_in_normal;t_lod_fstar ECNT=1;HCNT=1;MAX_ED=.;MIN_ED=.;NLOD=15.27;TLOD=5.83 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:86,3:0.034:2:1:0.667:3348,101:37:49
17 7571931 . T C . alt_allele_in_normal;clustered_events ECNT=3;HCNT=12;MAX_ED=95;MIN_ED=73;NLOD=30.37;TLOD=6.94 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:142,3:0.021:0:3:0.00:5413,120:69:73
17 7572004 . T C . alt_allele_in_normal;clustered_events ECNT=3;HCNT=12;MAX_ED=95;MIN_ED=73;NLOD=10.41;TLOD=22.71 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:151,9:0.056:6:3:0.667:5914,343:75:76
17 7572026 . T C . alt_allele_in_normal;clustered_events ECNT=3;HCNT=12;MAX_ED=95;MIN_ED=73;NLOD=37.77;TLOD=9.07 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:181,4:0.022:0:4:0.00:6714,156:94:87
17 7572250 . A G . alt_allele_in_normal ECNT=1;HCNT=1;MAX_ED=.;MIN_ED=.;NLOD=34.46;TLOD=7.62 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:164,4:0.024:2:2:0.500:6305,139:85:79
17 7572544 . T C . alt_allele_in_normal;t_lod_fstar ECNT=1;HCNT=2;MAX_ED=.;MIN_ED=.;NLOD=32.92;TLOD=5.27 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:146,3:0.020:3:0:1.00:5742,102:71:75
17 7572677 . A G . alt_allele_in_normal;t_lod_fstar ECNT=1;HCNT=1;MAX_ED=.;MIN_ED=.;NLOD=37.33;TLOD=5.49 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:161,3:0.018:0:3:1.00:6135,108:75:86
17 7573975 . T C . alt_allele_in_normal;t_lod_fstar ECNT=1;HCNT=2;MAX_ED=.;MIN_ED=.;NLOD=37.68;TLOD=4.04 GT:AD:AF:ALT_F1R2:ALT_F2R1:FOXOG:QSS:REF_F1R2:REF_F2R1 0/0:152,2:0.013:1:1:0.500:5851,78:70:82
• 2,887 views
•
link
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
It is an off question, but would you be so kind and unveil how did you get the bam files in first place?
Thanks