Could you please read the following posting?
Incosistent fold change signal : Differentially Expressed miRNA analysis : DEseq VS. Cuffdiff
Hello,
I am trying to identify differentially expressed microRNAs from my NGS data.
I have two conditions (control vs drug) Each condition has three replicates.
I have done the mapping procedure successfully and have done to identify differentially expressed miRNAs.
I have used three protocols.
Interestingly, my result report different results especially for cuffdiff vs edgeR/DeSeq.
The result from edgeR/DeSeq looks very similar.
Under the qvalue < 0.05 threshold,
I have only 2 miRNAs by DESeq and 5 miRNAs by edgeR (luckily, those two miRNAs are overlapped.) Also, when I relax the q value threshold 0.1 , those 5 miRNAs are overlapped in both DESeq and edgeR
However, for Cuffdiff result, I have 27 miRNAs (including Mirlet7d, Mirlet7a-1 etc.. which were not detected by DESeq or edgeR). And among above 5 identified DE microRNA (by edgeR/DESeq), only 4 of them are overlapped with 27 miRNAs by Cuffdiff.. Apparently, one of them are not.
So, I am not sure which tool I have to trust. I know different method has different strategy to detect DEG. however, I am not sure for my study, which one I have to trust.
Could you please give some comments for this?
You need to validate the DE miRNAs in additional samples, likely with qPCR. Then you'll know which result set is more reliable.
Could you please read the following posting?
Incosistent fold change signal : Differentially Expressed miRNA analysis : DEseq VS. Cuffdiff
Log in to answer this question.