This is a test version of Biostars. For the public version, visit https://www.biostars.org.
inconsistency between somatic SNV from Varscan and SNV from Samtools

HI all

I have two paired samples. One is Normal and the other is Tumor. I called SNP of both samples using Samtools/bcftools and then call somatic mutation using Varscan2. I get some somatic mutation from Varscan. But these mutation are not among the mutation list of tumor sample I got from samtools. Can someone help to explain.

Best

snp
• 2,490 views • link
updated by Ram Ram • written by dingxm • dingxm

1 answer

The two variant callers use very different theory for calling variants, so it is not surprising that the two give different results. It turns out that VarScan is very sensitive (or noisy, depending on your point-of-view) while samtools is less noisy. In practice, VarScan often needs to be further filtered to get reliable variants.

• 0 views • link
updated by Ram Ram • written by Sean Davis Sean Davis

Sean Thanks for your reply. These somatic mutations were got after strict filter. Is that possible these somatic mutations have low allele frequency and was not called as germline SNP by Samtools?

• 0 views • link
written by dingxm • dingxm

Log in to answer this question.

More posts like this