Dear all,
Please accept my apologize for asking probably basic question. Could you please let me know whether "TranscriptDecoder" find possible ORF in all 6 reading frames and reported them or it scores all reading frames and report the highest one? I plan to use this tool followed by blastp instead of using blastx that is really time-consuming. However, in this case I'm not sure if output of this pipeline is identical with blastx results and all possible data and information will be maintained. Thanks for sharing your comments and experience.
1 answer
Hello Seta,
In my view - Yes, Transdecoder finds ORF in all reading frame and report the ORF with greater coding score. I am guessing it after looking at my .pep and .cds file generated by transdecoder. But for confirmation I would suggest you to post your query at Transdecoder google group. Once you get your answer don't forget to comment back.
•
written
by
Dr Reema Singh
OK Thanks Seta
Log in to answer this question.
-
Getting Ensembl gene ID via biomart
written by seta
-
Do blastx and blastp calculate score differently?
written by Seq225
-
Regarding differentially expressed genes analysis
written by seta
-
Plotting GO annotation results
written by seta
-
which one is better to do, blastx or blastp?
written by seta
-
please share your experience for ORF prediction +blastp instead of doing blastx
written by seta
-
Is there any tool to convert blastx format from tabular to xml for feeding it to blast2go?
written by seta
-
Getting all translated ORFs from 6 frame not just longest ones
written by seta
-
Alternative way for annotation of assembled transcriptome using BLASTX
written by seta
-
Non-Coding Markov Model In Prokaryotic Gene Prediction
written by aniket.schneider •
