what is the difference between reference genome sequence from UCSC and ensembl ?
Hi:
To map reads, (small RNA sequencing) to reference genome, I'd like to download fasta-format sequence first.
As both ensembl and UCSC provide these resource, I wonder if there is any difference between these two resources?
For my purpose (mapping of small RNA sequencing reads), which would be a better choice?
Thanks!
Best
0 answers
No answers yet.
Log in to answer this question.
More posts like this
-
Reformatting Fastq to Fasta for Metagenomic Analysis
written by echolley •
-
Why is human genome FASTA file on GENCODE much smaller than that on ENSEMBL?
written by Xiaokang •
-
Resources to learn genome assembly workflow for small genomes (like viruses)
written by rezaeir75 •
-
HIV NL4-3 transcriptome fasta
written by xiaoleiusc
-
Mapping short 26-32nt RPF reads to human genome
written by Adrian Pelin
-
should non-protein-coding rna(e.g. lncRNA) be removed in RNA-Seq differential expression analysis
written by hellocita •
-
NCBI vs Ensembl - which one to chose - for downloading protein fasta files
written by Idit •
-
miRDeep2: mapping produced bowtie.log and mapper.log - which one to trust?
written by CandiceChuDVM
-
Difference between the Fasta files from UCSC and Gencode/Ensembl
written by ATRX
-
gff format to genome annotation
written by h.mon
Duplicate question
Is there any differences between Human Genome downloaded from UCSC website and the on from Ensembl