updated 5 days ago by
chloek88
•
0
•
written 5.5 years ago by
Philipp Bayer
8.4k
3
votes
4
replies
4.0k
views
4
votes
6
replies
373
views
updated 3 hours ago by
Matthias Zepper
4.6k
•
written 5 days ago by
prifa
▴
10
10
votes
3
replies
306
views
updated 5 days ago by
b.contreras.moreira
▴
180
•
written 5 days ago by
ijarne
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
141
views
1
vote
2
replies
189
views
0
votes
0
replies
118
views
5 days ago by
Omics data mining
▴
260
0
votes
2
replies
177
views
5 days ago by
njornet
▴
20
0
votes
2
replies
202
views
0
votes
5
replies
248
views
0
votes
0
replies
172
views
0
votes
5
replies
299
views
2
votes
1
reply
135
views
0
votes
0
replies
83
views
5 days ago by
usa.cd.genomics
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
90
views
5 days ago by
usa.cd.genomics
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
102
views
5 days ago by
kyj222637
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
148
views
updated 5 days ago by
Bastien Hervé
5.3k
•
written 5 days ago by
sooni
▴
20
1
vote
5
replies
417
views
0
votes
1
reply
250
views
updated 5 days ago by
mizraelson
▴
60
•
written 13 days ago by
yueli7
▴
250
1
vote
3
replies
235
views
0
votes
0
replies
96
views
5 days ago by
synat.keam
▴
100
0
votes
2
replies
199
views
1
vote
4
replies
370
views
5 days ago by
heelpPlease
•
0
0
votes
7
replies
482
views
0
votes
0
replies
111
views
6 days ago by
carlopecoraro2
★
2.5k
0
votes
2
replies
467
views
updated 5 days ago by
Javier
•
0
•
written 3 months ago by
fra.r.silvestro
▴
10
0
votes
1
reply
246
views
5
votes
5
replies
287
views
0
votes
2
replies
212
views
updated 4 days ago by
swbarnes2
14k
•
written 6 days ago by
ahmad.sajad4541
•
0
1
vote
9
replies
353
views
updated 3 days ago by
i.sudbery
19k
•
written 6 days ago by
Assa Yeroslaviz
★
1.8k
1
vote
1
reply
165
views
0
votes
0
replies
110
views
6 days ago by
analyst
▴
50
0
votes
3
replies
172
views
7
votes
1
reply
167
views
2
votes
2
replies
175
views
5 days ago by
Zeng Jingyu
▴
60
1
vote
2
replies
261
views
0
votes
4
replies
272
views
2 days ago by
Researcher
▴
30
1
vote
2
replies
177
views
1
vote
1
reply
218
views
1
vote
5
replies
343
views
updated 5 days ago by
Michael
54k
•
written 6 days ago by
qwertyuiop26
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
177
views
0
votes
2
replies
259
views
updated 6 days ago by
Xiaofen
•
0
•
written 6 days ago by
toddknutson
▴
60
0
votes
1
reply
133
views
2
votes
2
replies
179
views
0
votes
0
replies
114
views
6 days ago by
Scott McKay
▴
30
0
votes
0
replies
106
views
6 days ago by
piotto
▴
20
0
votes
0
replies
141
views
1
vote
3
replies
258
views
1
vote
6
replies
696
views
updated 6 days ago by
GenoMax
142k
•
written 6 months ago by
michael.flower.14
▴
180
1
vote
1
reply
206
views
updated 6 days ago by
geneontologyhelp
▴
400
•
written 7 days ago by
beshka194
•
0
1
vote
2
replies
238
views
Recent Votes
Recent Locations •
All
Canada, just now
United Kingdom, 1 minute ago
University Park, USA, 2 minutes ago
United States, 2 minutes ago
Germany, 4 minutes ago
Colombia/Bogotá, 5 minutes ago
United States, 5 minutes ago
Recent Awards •
All
Popular Question to
bioinfo
▴
150
Popular Question to
Sara
▴
30
Popular Question to
anasjamshed
▴
120
Popular Question to
pablo
▴
300
Scholar to
Bastien Hervé
5.3k
Popular Question to
rj.rezwan
•
0
Scholar to
colindaven
6.4k
Recent Replies
Comment: consensus sequence calling
by
bk11
★
2.4k
Please check out these posts
https://www.biostars.org/p/367626/
Answer: Splitting Seurat object by sample layers
by
bk11
★
2.4k
You can do the following-
Idents(SeuratObj) <- "orig.ident"
control_set <- subset(SeuratObj, idents = c("counts.control","data.…
Comment: Galaxy StringTie error
by
GenoMax
142k
> I have sent a bug report to the Galaxy administrator
If you have not done so please post this in Galaxy help forum for directed help: h…
Comment: 44% Successfully Assigned Fragments with featureCounts after 85% uniquely mapped
by
Thind amarinder
▴
340
Wondering, if it was total RNAseq data? or ployA
Comment: RNA seq analysis
by
Matthias Zepper
4.6k
It is still obscure to me how many different tissues you would like to include into your comparison and what your intended design is.
To …
Comment: Getting the coding_sequence.fasta from the .gff file from the AUGUSTUS gene pred
by
Juke34
8.6k
You can get a look here https://www.biostars.org/p/9465973/
Answer: Mouse ribosome sequences in fasta format
by
GenoMax
142k
A version of the mouse rDNA repeat can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/BK000964
Use the dropdown menu at top-left t…
Comment: Kraken2 database
by
Christopher
•
0
Hello, Mathew.
Firstly, thank you for answering my question.
**Sorry, what analysis are you trying to perform with these databases?**
I a…
Comment: Benchmarking RNASeq Variant Calling Pipeline (Short Reads)
by
GenoMax
142k
As long as it is the same GIAB sample you could compare your SNP with the SNP's available for the whole genome set.
Comment: Single-cell RNA-seq FindMarker and EnhancedVolcano Plot: most genes are low -log
by
yau
•
0
Dear Mensur,
Thanks so much for your reply!!
In my case, I got 1 control(healthy) and 2 disease mouse Single cell RNA-sew data, so I …
Comment: BWA alignment
by
ATpoint
82k
The relevant code line is precisely the same as in the question.
Answer: imputation through beagle
by
dthorbur
★
1.9k
Building a reference panel from the samples you intend to impute seems like a very circular approach. Plus, GBS is a reduced representation…
Answer: Single-cell RNA-seq FindMarker and EnhancedVolcano Plot: most genes are low -log
by
Mensur Dlakic
★
27k
You seem to have too stringent of a p-value cutoff (1e-5). Hopefully you get the concept of how the interplay of `-log10P-value` and `log2F…
Comment: Single-cell RNA-seq FindMarker and EnhancedVolcano Plot: most genes are low -log
by
yau
•
0
![enter image description here][1]
[1]: /media/images/7199a665-b13a-40c8-a065-313cf2b7
Traffic: 2833 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6