How to evaluate correlation for multiple measurements per point?
1
0
Entering edit mode
4.9 years ago

I've got a question about statistics. I have an experiment in which X - is a length of DNA fragment and for each X, there are 4 measurements of Y. Suppose, it is not obvious that there is an increase of Y with X. What is the proper statistic to verify that this increase is not a fluke?

P.S. I have many experiments like that so the answer will be useful. I don't think a simple correlation will do since the measurements are not independent: there are 4 replicates for each X. Also averaging is not good since this way I would lose a lot of stat power.

sample data

statistics • 1.1k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

I would think more along the regression route in order to check the rate of change of one group per unit change in another (<- the beta coefficient). You may try a LOESS or linear fit. Looking at your plot, the increase appears linear. The penultimate measurement looks 'all over the place', though. Note that there are no statisticians here (that I know) - for a better answer, try Cross Validated.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you very much! Great help! I have similar feedback from a statistician, with similar sentiments.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Yo should be aware of position-related sequencing artifacts

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you very much!

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
4.9 years ago

Finally, I just used a simple correlation test and it seemed to work just fine.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2457 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6