Installation of Bcl2Fastq Fails
0
0
Entering edit mode
7.8 years ago
dec986 ▴ 370

I am trying to install Illumina's bcl2fastq but I am getting errors I can't find solutions to:

-- Found Doxygen: /usr/bin/doxygen 
-- Doxygen: /usr/bin/doxygen. Dot: DOXYGEN_DOT_EXECUTABLE-NOTFOUND.
-- Creating Doxygen config file: /home/con/Downloads/bcl2fastq_v1.8.4/src/c++/Doxyfile
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! Couldn't configure the project

Google doesn't have anything on this... and Illumina technical support is very very slow... does anyone know how to solve this?

thanks :)

bcl2fastq basespace software error illumina • 3.7k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

If your system accepts RPMs, then that'll be easier than getting this compiled.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

What sequencer are you hoping to process the data from? If that is NextSeq 500 or HiSeq 3K/4K then you should get the new version of bcl2fastq (v. 2.17.x). As @Devon said use the RPM if you can.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

As Devon suggested, I downloaded the RPM, and am trying to convert to deb but this fails:

con@e:~/Downloads/bcl2fastq_v1.8.4$ fakeroot alien bcl2fastq-1.8.4-Linux-x86_64.rpm Unpacking of 'bcl2fastq-1.8.4-Linux-x86_64.rpm' failed at /usr/share/perl5/Alien/Package/Rpm.pm line 168.

I looked at the line 168:

$this->do("rpm2cpio '".$this->filename."' | (cd $workdir; $decomp cpio --extract --make-directories --no-absolute-filenames --preserve-modification-time) 2>&1")
    or die "Unpacking of '".$this->filename."' failed";

I have no idea how to fix this :(

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Which perl are you using? As I recollect, Bcl2fastq v.1.x requires perl v.5.12.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

hi genomax2,

I'm using 5.22.1, I tried this, as you said,

use 5.12.0;

but it outputs Name "Alien::Version" used only once: possible typo at alien.pl line 375.

and no output file. I comment this line out, and nothing happens.

-still stuck

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

I suggest that you get bcl2fastq v.2.17.x. It is backwards compatible with all sequencer types and should install easier than v.1.x.

That said see if these two threads help: http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=45649
http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=45649

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Do you just have to demultiplex stuff this one time or is this going to be a regular thing? If this is just a one-off instance, then it might be simplest to setup a Centos-based docker container and directly install bcl2fastq in it. You could then demultiplex stuff inside the container. Yes, this seems convoluted, but it might prove quicker.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2417 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6